Mechanisms of self-identification in M. Hrushevsky’s ego-narratives: E. Golubynsky’s “case study”


The purpose of the article is to investigate the strategies of professional self-identification in the ego-narratives of M. Hrushevsky (on the example of the construction of the intellectual biography of E. Golubinsky). Research methods: «case study», comparative, structural and textological. Main results: M. Hrushevsky's «ego-narrative» was constructed according to a common model of self-identification with the «significant other» − the Russian historian E. Golubinsky. This strategy included such common structural components (that formed the image of the "ideal historian" in M. Hrushevsky's ego-narratives) as: origin (social); type of scholarship (ascetic); methodology (critical-skeptical); scholarship living project (creating the national historiographical metanarrative); mental crisis (disease) of 1904. The difference between the intellectual biographies of M. Hrushevsky and E. Golubinsky was reflected in the common point of the transformation of their «ego narratives» into the form of «illness narratives» precisely in 1904. If the Ukrainian historian managed to overcome the consequences of the mental crisis of 1904, the Russian one fell victim to the collapse of his health and was unable to realize his own «life project» − writing the historiographical metanarrative. Practical significance: recommended for using by specialists in the sphere of biography, personology, intellectual history, psychohistory. Scientific innovation: on the basis of textual analysis, the structural components of the intellectual biography of the «ideal historian» were identified for the first time. Type of article: analytical and empirical.

Author Biography

Volodymyr Vashchenko, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

D. Sc. (History), Senior Research Fellow, Professor at the Department of History of Ukraine, Faculty of History, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University


Hrushev'kyy, M., 1980. Yak ya buv kolys' beletrystom Ukrayins'kyy istoryk. [How I used to be a fiction writer. Ukrainian historian], no. 1–4, pp. 89–94.

Hrushevs'kyy, M., 1995. Shchodennyky (1904-1910 rr.) Kyyivs'ka starovyna [Diaries (1904-1910), Kyiv Antiquities], no. 1, pp. 10–30.

Hrushevs'kyy, M., 1912 Pamyaty Yevhena Holubinskoho, Zapysy Nauk. T-va im. Shevchenka. [In memory of Yevhen Golubinsky, Notes of the Scientific Society named after Shevchenko], year XXI, vol. SѴIII, book. 11, pp. 140–145.

Hrushevs'kyy, M., 1979. Avtobiorafiya (1926). Ukrayins'kyy istoryk. Autobiography (1926). Ukrainian historian, № 1-4 (65-68). c. 79-87.

Hrushevs'kyy, M., 1992, Avtobiohrafiya (1906), Velykyy Ukrayinets': Materialy z zhyttya ta diyal'nosti M.Hrushevs'koho [Autobiography (1906). Great Ukrainian: Materials from the life and work of M. Hrushevskyi]. Kyiv: Veselka, pp. 197–213.

Hrushevs'kyy,M., 1894. Vstupnyy vyklad z davn'oyi istoriyi Rusy, vyholoshenyy u L'vivs'kim universyteti 30 veresnya 1894, Zapysky Naukovoho tovarystva u L'vovi [Introductory lecture on the ancient history of Rus', delivered at the Lviv University on September 30, 1894, Notes of the Scientific Society in Lviv], vol. 4, pp. 140–150.

Vashchenko, V., 2009. Kontsept «intelektual'na biohrafiya» ta konstruyuvannya «naukovykh biohrafiy» v ukrayins'kiy istoriohrafiyi. Eydos. Al'manakh teoriyi ta istoriyi istorychnoyi nauky [The concept of "intellectual biography" and construction of "scientific biographies" in Ukrainian historiography. Eidos. Almanac on Theory and History of Historical Science], is.4, pp. 475–486.
How to Cite
VASHCHENKO, Volodymyr. Mechanisms of self-identification in M. Hrushevsky’s ego-narratives: E. Golubynsky’s “case study”. Universum Historiae et Archeologiae = The Universe of History and Archeology = Універсум історії та археології ISSN 2664-9950 (Print) ISSN 2707-6385 (Online), [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1-2, dec. 2022. ISSN 2707-6385. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 28 may 2023. doi:
Historiography. Source Study. Special Historical Disciplines