Object and subject of historical research in the coordinate system of traditional logic
The purpose of the article is to clarify the logical basis of the substantive distinction between the object and the subject of historical research.
Research methods: analysis, synthesis, abstraction, definition of concepts, limitations and generalizations, hermeneutic, comparative.
The main results: the problems of determining the content of the concepts of the object and subject of knowledge, historical science and specific historical research, as well as the substantive distinction between the object and subject of historical research are defined; the state of solving the problem by scientists at this stage is criticized; the concept of history and the object of historical knowledge are meaningfully connected; the logical content of the object and subject of historical research is determined; logical relationship between the object and the subject of historical research is established; three types of relations between the object and the subject of historical research are revealed; the necessity to apply the methods and rules of traditional logic in determining the object and subject of historical research is proved; some specific features of historical science as a kind of historical knowledge are highlighted.
Practical significance: the results of the research can be used in understanding the theoretical and methodological foundations of specific historical research, especially in dissertations, as well as in the development of appropriate educational and methodological courses at historical faculties and during preparation of students’ research papers.
Originality: the work is completely original, it contains a critique of a number of works on the definition of the object and subject of research; it has elements of scientific reasoning and logical analysis.
Scientific novelty: the author’s interpretation of the meaningful distinction between the object and the subject of historical research is offered.
Type of article: theoretical and methodological, analytical.
Bocharov, A. V., 2007. Podkhody k ponimaniyu totalnoy istorii [Approaches to understanding total history]. Metodologicheskiye i istoriograficheskiye voprosy istoricheskoy nauki [Methodological and historiographical questions of historical science]. Tomsk: Izd-vo TGU, issue 28, pp. 108–118 (in Russian).
Braichevskyi, M. Yu., 1995. Vstup do istorychnoi nauky [Introduction to historical science]. Kyiv: KM AKADEMIA (in Ukrainian).
Horban, Yu.A., 2012. Istorychne doslidzhennia: naukovo-metodychni pidkhody do napysannia dysertatsiinoi roboty [Historical research: scientific and methodological approaches to writing a dissertation]. Available at: http://inb.dnsgb.com.ua/2012–1/12_gorban.pdf [Accessed: 02.11.2021] (in Ukrainian).
Zherebkin, V. Ye., 1998. Lohika [Logic]. Kharkiv: Osnova; Kyiv: Znannia (in Ukrainian).
Zatserkovnyi, V.I., Tishaiev, I.V., and Demydov, V.K., 2017. Metodolohiia naukovykh doslidzhen [Research methodology]. Nizhyn: NDU im. M. Hoholia (in Ukrainian).
Istorychna nauka: terminolohichnyi i poniatiinyi dovidnyk [Historical science: terminological and conceptual guide], 2002. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola (in Ukrainian).
Kyrylchuk, V.T., 2010. Problema piznavalnoho vidnoshennia mizh subiektom i obiektom [The problem of the cognitive relationship between subject and object]. Naukovi zapysky [Scientific notes]. Kirovohrad: KNTU, issue 10, part 2, pp. 275–277 (in Ukrainian).
Kovalchenko, I.D., 1987. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Methods of historical research]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Collingwood, R. G. 1996. Ideia istorii [The idea of history]. Kyiv: Osnovy (in Russian).
Kravchenko, P. A., and Melnyk, A. I., 2010. Osmyslennia istorii: yevropeiskyi i ukrainskyi dyskurs [Understanding history: European and Ukrainian discourse]. Istorychna pamiat [Historical memory], issue 2, pp. 4–12 (in Ukrainian).
Martyushov, L.N., 2016. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Methods of historical research]. Ekaterinburg (in Russian).
Obiekt istorychnoi nauky [Object of historical science]. Istorychnyi slovnyk terminiv ta poniat z istorii Ukrainy [Historical dictionary of terms and concepts from the history of
Ukraine]. Available at: https://histua.com/slovnik/o/obyekt-istorichnoi-nauki [Accessed: 02.11.2021] (in Ukrainian).
Osnovni vymohy do dysertatsii ta avtoreferativ dysertatsii [Basic requirements for dissertations and dissertation abstracts], 2007. Biuleten VAK Ukrainy [Bulletin of the Higher Attestation Commission of Ukraine], issue 6, pp. 41–48 (in Ukrainian).
Poberezhnikov, I.V., 2007. Predmet istoricheskogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskiye problemy [Subject of historical research: methodological problems]. Ural industrialnyy. Bakuninskiye chteniya [Industrial Ural. Bakunin readings]. Materialy VIII Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii. 27–28 aprelya. 2007. Ekaterinburg, 1, pp. 401–407 (in Russian).
Predmet [Subject], 1986. Filosofskyi slovnyk [Philosophical dictionary]. Kyiv: Holov. red. URE, pp. 522–523 (in Ukrainian).
Predmet istorychnoi nauky [The subject of historical science]. Istorychnyi slovnyk terminiv ta poniat z istorii Ukrainy [Historical dictionary of terms and concepts from the history of Ukraine]. Available at: https://histua.com/slovnik/p/predmet-istorichnoi-nauki (Accessed: 02.11.2021) (in Ukrainian).
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language], 1974. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, vol. 5 (in Ukrainian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.