History of Judiciary of the end of the 18th and the first half of the 19th century in the territory of Southern Ukraine in epistolary sources
The change in the modern scientific paradigm of historical research encourages a more active study of the personal, subjective, "human" in various spheres of society. The purpose of the article: is to analyze the information potential of epistolary sources on the history of justice on the territory of Southern Ukraine in the last quarter of the eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth century. Research methods: biographical, comparative studies, method of internal criticism of the sources. Main results. All letters can be divided into two groups. The first being letters of various kinds, are directly in the court cases themselves. The second, being private letters of persons, mention cases of contact with the judicial system and give its characteristics. The letters preserved in court archives are divided into private and business ones. The first ones were provided as evidence in cases; the second ones were used as a power of attorney. In the first group, the most interesting is the correspondence between the leader of the nobility of Yekaterinoslav governorate, Konstantin Lalosh, and his wife, Martha, in the 1780s. Letters of assistance to high-ranking officials are informative in terms of understanding the court process, attitude to the law, and combating office abuse by members of the court. They, as well as letters of instruction (“letters of credence”) of this period sometimes contain elements of private communication. That is, business and private correspondence often had common features and similarities. In addition to the procedure for obtaining legal services, the preserved epistolary describes the procedure for examining a criminal corpse. During this period, each landowner had experience in communicating with the judiciary, often in civil proceedings. Land tenure, inheritance, conflicts were resolved through the courts, debts were withheld. There is frequent evidence of such facts in ego-documents. The result of the lawsuit is correspondence between the famous writer Vasyl Kapnist and his counterpart Tekla Tarnovska (1797–1798). The consideration of mutual claims for property rights lasted for more than 20 years, for some time it took place in the chamber of the civil court of Yekaterinoslav governorate. The case was complicated by various circumstances and finally resolved by mutual agreement outside the courtroom. There are 17 letters from both sides, which were sent in search of understanding. Equally important is brief information about the activities of the courts which occur in the correspondence of this period (for example, the published complex of letters of the Yekaterinoslav landowners the Nechaievs). Conclusions. All epistolary sources demonstrate the importance of courts in the life of the society in the Southern Ukraine in the last quarter of the eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth century. They tried to maintain good relations with court officials, avoided appearing before judges, but had little hope for judicial justice. Therefore, the need for control over attorneys and litigation was often pointed out; at the same time with trials, high officials and the emperor were usually addressed. Reconciliation processes were also popular. The analyzed epistolary books, some of which are introduced into scientific circulation for the first time, have significant information potential for research of social, gender, economic history of the region in this period. Type of article: research.
Abrosymova, S., 2003. Epistoliarna spadshchyna Nechaievykh v istorychnomu konteksti [The Nechaevs’ epistolary heritage in a historical context]. Dzherela z istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy [Sources on the history of Southern Ukraine]. Zaporizhzhia: RA “Tandem-U”, vol. 3, pp. 10–20 (in Ukrainian).
Balukh, V. S., 2006. Istoriia komertsiinykh sudiv: Istoryko-pravove doslidzhennia na prykladi Odeskoho
komertsiinoho sudu (1808–1917) [History of Commercial Courts: Historical and Legal Research on the Example of the Odessa Commercial Court (1808–1917)]. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura (in Ukrainian).
Boiko, A., ed., 2003. Epistoliarna spadshchyna rodyny Nechaievykh (kinets XVIII – persha polovyna XX stolittia) [Epistolary legacy of the family of nonuclear (the end of the XVIII – the first half of the XX century)]. Dzherela z istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy [Sources on the history of Southern Ukraine]. Zaporizhzhia: RA “Tandem-U”, vol. 3 (in Ukrainian).
Brekhunenko, V., 2020. Upovnovazhennia advokata kliientom yak dzerkalo stavlennia starshyny Hetmanshchyny do imperskoho tsentru u XVIII st. [Powers of the client’s lawyer as a re ection of the attitude of Cossack nobility of the Hetman state to the imperial center in the 18th century]. Naukovi pratsi Kamianets‑Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka. Istorychni nauky [Scientific Papers of Kamianets- Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University. Historical sciences], vol. 30, pp. 247–258 (in Ukrainian).
Brekhunenko, V., and Syniak, I., 2017. Advokaty v sudochynstvi rannomodernoi Ukrainskoi derzhavy – Hetmanshchyny [Lawyers in the justice of the early Modern Ukrainian State – Hetmanate]. Kyiv: KVITs (in Ukrainian).
Voloshyn, Yu., 2019. Kozatska femida: hrodske sudochynstvo v Hetmanshchyni [Cossack Themis: Grodsky Justice in Hetmanate]. Kyiv: K.I.S. (in Ukrainian).
Hedo, A. V., 2012. Mariupolskyi hretskyi sud: istoriia stvorennia ta diialnist [Mariupol Greek court: History of creation and activity]. Donetsk: DonNU (in Ukrainian).
Delo o iske pomeschitsyi Tarnovskoy Feklyi k nadvornomu sovetniku Kapnistu o zahvate ranee kuplennyih u nego zemelnyih ugodiy. 1791–1796 [The case on the claim of the landowners of the Tarnowskaya Fekla to the Superior Advisor to the Capnist about the capture of land-purchased land. 1791–1796]. File 3. Inventory 1. Fund 72. Dnіpro: Derzhavnyi arkhiv Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti [State Archive of Dnipropetrovsk region] (in Russian).
Delo podpolkovnika Depreradovicha o zaschite imeniya maloletnih Gersevanovyih. 1826–1833 gg. [The case of Lieutenant Colonel Depreraradovich about the protection of the estates of young Gerseganov. 1826–1833]. File 57. Inventory 190. Fund 1. Odesa: Derzhavnyi arkhiv Odeskoi oblasti [State Archive of Odesa region] (in Russian).
Dmytriienko, M., and Voitsekhivska I., 1998. Epistolohrafiia (epistolohiia) yak nauka istorychnoho tsyklu. [Epistolography (epistology) as a science of the historical cycle]. Spetsialni istorychni dystsypliny [Special historical disciplines], no. 2, pp. 23–45 (in Ukrainian).
Zaruba, V., 2013. Zemlevlasnyky Katerynoslavskoho povitu dvoriany Nechaievy [Landowners of the Katerinoslav district of the nobles of Nechaev]. Pravo i suspilstvo [Right and society], no. 1, pp. 11–22 (in Ukrainian).
Kapnyst, V. V., 1960. Sobranie sochineniy v 2 t. [Collected works in 2 volumes]. Moscow, Leningrad: AN SSSR. In‑t rus. lyteraturyi (Pushkynskyi dom), vol. 2, pp. 433–436; 438–439 (in Russian)
Kryvosheia, V. V., Kryvosheia, I. I., and Kryvosheia O. V., 2009. Neuriadova starshyna Hetmanshchyny [Non-governmental elder administration of Hetmanate]. Kyiv: Stylos (in Ukrainian).
Lysty Kapnista V. V. do Tarnovskoi T. T. [Kapnist’s letters to Tarnovska]. Files 24173–24178. Fund III. Kyiv: Instytut rukopysu NBU im. V. I. Vernadskoho (in Russian).
Lysty Tarnovskoi T. T. do Kapnista V. V. [Tarnowski’s letters to Kraknist]. Files 24179–24189. Fund III. Kyiv: Instytut rukopysu NBU im. V. I. Vernadskoho (in Russian).
Marasinova, E., 2017. “Zakon” i “grazhdanin” v Rossii vtoroy polovini XVІІІ veka: ocherki istorii obschestvennogo soznaniya [The Law and the Citizen in Russia in the Second Half of the 17th Century: Essays on the History of Public Consciousness]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (in Russian).
Masliichuk, V., 2011. Nepovnolitni zlochyntsi v Kharkivskomu namisnytstvi. 1780–1796 rr. [Minor criminals in Kharkiv Vicegerency. 1780–1796]. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi muzei pryvatnoi sadyby (in Ukrainian).
O obraze zhizni i bezporyadnom upravlenii krestyanami pomeschika Ekaterinoslavskoy gubernii Petra Rodzyanki. 1842 g. [On the lifestyle of the landowner of the Yekaterinoslav province Peter Rodzianko]. File 83. Inventory 152. 1842 year. Fund 1. Odesa: Derzhavnyi arkhiv Odeskoi oblasti [State Archive of Odesa region] (in Russian).
Perederiienko, V., 1997. Peredmova. Pryvatni lysty XVIII st. [Preface. Private letters of the XVIII century]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, pp. 5–16 (in Ukrainian).
Po zhalobe zhenyi otstavnogo poruchika Lukina na sekretarya Bobrinetskogo uezdnogo suda Fetisova i zasedatelya Makoveeva za sklonenie muzha eya k prodazhe im imeniya ego [On the complaint of the wife of retired lieutenant Lukin against the officials of the Bobrinets district court]. File 2. Inventory 192. 1844 year. Fund 1. Odesa: Derzhavnyi arkhiv Odeskoi oblasti [State Archive of Odesa region] (in Russian).
Po prosheniyu nadvornoy sovetnitsyi Kohanovoy ob uchinenii razbora dela ee s bratyami s Fedorom i Nikonom Andreevyimi, zavladevshimi posle smerti ottsa ee dvizhimyim i nedvizhimyim imeniem 1792 g. [At the request of the nadvornaja sovetnica Kokhanova for the division of the inheritance]. File 14. Inventory 1. Fund 467. Dnіpro: Derzhavnyi arkhiv Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti [State Archive of Dnipropetrovsk region] (in Russian).
Po prosheniyu pomeschika mayora Lalasha o vzyiskanii i… ob opredelenii chasti imeniya drugomu maloletnemu ee syinu Nikolayu, prizhitomu uzhe s nim Lalashem. 1791–1792. [At the request of the landowner Major Lalash for the recovery and … for the determination of part of the estate to another young son Nikolai]. File 13. Inventory 1. Fund 467. Dnіpro: Derzhavnyi arkhiv Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti [State Archive of Dnipropetrovsk region] (in Russian).
Posunko, O., 2018. “Detskie prestupleniya” i prestupleniya protiv detey v sudebnoy praktike posledney chetverti XVIII veka (po materialam Gosudarstvennogo arhiva Dnepropetrovskoy oblasti). [Juvenile crimes and crimes against children in judicial practice of the last quarter of the 18th century (based on materials of the State Archive of the Dnipropetrovsk region)]. Tabularium Historiae, Bydgoszcz, vol. III. pp. 125–152 (in Russian).
Posunko, O., 2020. Katerynoslavskyi sovisnyi sud (1784–1855 rr.): etapy ta osoblyvosti diialnosti [Katerynoslav Conscientious Court (1784–1855): The Stages and Features of Activity]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Historical Journal], no. 6, pp. 57–68 (in Ukrainian).
Posunko, O. M., 2018. Pershiy predvoditel katerinoslavskogo dvoryanstva K. Lalosh: syuzheti do biografiyi kriz prizmu sudovogo protsesu. [The first leader of the Katerynoslav nobility K. Lalosh: plots to a biography through the prism of the trial]. Universum Historiae et Archaeologiae. Dnipro, vol. 1 (26), issue 1–2, pp. 14–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/2611802 (in Ukrainian).
Sokyrko, O., 2007. Skilky koshtuie porozuminnia? “Poklony” ta „naklady” v ukrainskykh sudakh pershoi chverti XVIII stolittia [How much does an agreement cost? “Poklony” and “naklady” (court costs) in the Ukrainian courts of the first quarter of the XVIII century]. Sotsium: Almanakh sotsialnoi istorii [Socium. Almanac of Social History], issue 7, pp. 195–209 (in Ukrainian).
Starchenko, N., 2014. Chest, krov i rytoryka. Konflikt u shliakhetskomu seredovyshchi Volyni (druha polovyna XVI–XVII stolittia) [Honour, Blood, and Rethoric. Conflicts in the Volhynian Gentry Milieu. Second Half of the 16th through the Early 17th Century]. Kyiv: Laurus (in Ukrainian).
Surieva, N., 2003. Lystuvannia rodyny Nechaievykh yak dzherelo z istorii dvorianstva Pivdennoi Ukrainy kintsia XVIII – pershoi polovyny XIX stolittia [Nechaevs’ family correspondence as a source on the history of the Southern Ukraine nobility at the end of the 18 – first half of the 19 century]. Dzherela z istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy [Sources on the history of Southern Ukraine]. Zaporizhzhia: RA “Tandem-U”, vol. 3, pp. 21–28 (in Ukrainian).
Shandra V., 2011. Sovisni sudy v Ukraini (ostannia chvert XVIII – seredyna XIX st.) [Conscientious court in Ukraine (the last quarter of the 18th – the middle of the 19th century)]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy (in Ukrainian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who are published in the journal «Universum Historiae et Archeologiae» agree to the following terms:
– copyright on the article is retained by the author(s); the authors grant the right of the first publication to the journal «Universum Historiae et Archeologiae». After submitting his text to the editorial board, the author of the article should not violate the copyrights of other individuals and organizations;
– the author of the published article has the right to distribute it in the form in which it is published in the journal «Universum Historiae et Archeologiae» (for example, to post the article in repositories, personal scientific profiles, websites or publish as a part of a monograph), provided that the bibliographic links to the first publication of the work in the journal «Universum Historiae et Archeologiae» are present (or links to an electronic copy, which is stored on the official website of the journal).